Hardly anyone wrote or writes about the two TV series that have Jean-Luc Godard and Anne-Marie Miéville realized in the mid 70s. In his essay collection negotiations Deleuze has thus set apart within a post. Daney was also done, otherwise there is to little. For one thing, is certainly the fact that the two series "Six Fois Deux - sur et sous la communication" and "France tour détrou deux enfants" can hardly be seen, there are no DVDs, no downloads, if any of VHS copies of the x-th generation. The other reason is also that the almost twenty episodes are among the most bulky, the Godard has realized to date. (Thérrorisé "Daney called his style at that time, a mixture of terrorizing and theorizing.) It does require, in fact, a lot of time and patience, you can start up with the series somewhat, but they belong to me now with the most interesting things that have made Godard / Mieville, and they are one of the most extensive television experiments in general. Deleuze has talked to the stuttering on TV:
"In some ways it is always a question not to stutter stutter in their speech, but in the language itself is in general can only be a stranger in another language But here it goes.. therefore to be a stranger in your own language. [...] He has to [Godard, FK] even perfected his Swiss accent. [...] Godard has a nice formula: Not a true picture, but nothing more than an image. The philosophers would say, and they would come out with him to do it: not correct ideas or thoughts, but nothing more than thoughts. For correct thoughts, these are still thoughts that conform to prevailing meanings or established solutions, there are still thoughts that confirm something, even if that something still is, even if it's the future of the revolution. "Nothing is more" as a thought-If present, however, it is a stuttering in the idea it can only be expressed in the form of questions that bring the answers tend to silence. . Or is it the point of something simple that throws all arguments to the winds "
The result 3 is one of the more explicit - it is about the role of the media: why a press photographer is paid for impressions, an amateur photographer but not Why? 'Some Photographed be paid, but others just murdered it And in the end comes rather abruptly Anne-Marie Miéville and shows what holds together a magazine at heart?
0 comments:
Post a Comment