Sometimes it is strange that it works at all. You sit on a film after another, and yet takes from you and to participate in fate - whether real or fictitious first matter - is so taken and moved that formal or substantive questions arise later. The revenge of the cinema at this "false empathy" were for Godard (in the "Histoire (s) du cinéma), the newsreels of World War II, in which the cinema now asked real pain and real tears. In the case of Libya, but there is little such images, and those who are wise, absurdly, back to the cinema universe, on films where we actually went out not from a direct reference to reality. The two sections, in which Muammar al-Gaddafi speaks out on current events and to remind the assembly of al jazeera me more of the recently concluded Berlinale as a non-cinematic reality as otherwise reported. The interview with an umbrella in the car and the speech from grungy backdrop that is "Os Resident", only not as colorful or equal to "La Chinoise". The two settings near the alleged dissidents that is still in the Benning. And the concert is the festival circuit. But as harmless, it is natural Unfortunately not. And this is also the terrible to al-Gaddafi, who is the most bizarre ruler of the North African countries - but also one of the most cruel. Or, as Fuller says: "Life is in color, black and white is more realistic."
0 comments:
Post a Comment